“Enfocus says Griffin's true-shape nesting and gang-run printing cut material costs by up to 50%.”

Enfocus's own Griffin page attributes an 'up to 50%' figure to true-shape nesting, but it is phrased as a waste reduction, not a material-cost reduction, and the source separately lists cutting costs as a distinct benefit without a percentage. The page does describe combining multiple jobs on one sheet/roll, which resembles gang-run printing, but it never uses that term, so the claim's wording is a loose paraphrase rather than a verbatim match.