← Verdict register
✗ False

“Kornit's NeoPigment inks, as used by Printful, are non-toxic and adhere to OEKO-TEX STANDARD 100 and the Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS).”

Kornit's own safety data sheet for NeoPigment Eco-Rapid White ink (SDS 60-SDSU-0112, revision 4.2, 9 April 2024) classifies it Acute Tox. 4, H302 "Harmful if swallowed", and Skin Sens. 1, H317 "May cause an allergic skin reaction", with the signal word warning, under 29 CFR 1910.1200. The ink's maker contradicts "non-toxic". The two certification marks were already cited at the wrong object when this verdict was published: STANDARD 100 certifies the garment and GOTS approves inputs without declaring them free of hazardous substances. No part of the claim holds as worded, so the rating is False. The SDS covers the white ink, the one a Kornit DTG shop uses most; we have not read the sheets for the other colours. kornit.com refuses our fetcher, so the sheet was read with a browser user agent.

This verdict was revised on , against kornit.com. It was published as ◐ Partly true. The reasoning it was published with is below, unedited.

As first published

Both marks are real and both are cited at the wrong object. STANDARD 100 is “a label for textiles tested for harmful substances… from yarn to finished product” — it certifies the printed garment, and the certificate belongs to whoever made that garment, not to the ink in it. The mark an ink can carry is ECO PASSPORT, “designed for manufacturers and distributors of chemicals”. GOTS certifies no ink either: inks are Chemical Inputs, “assessed and approved… by a Scope 4 Approved Certifier” and issued a Letter of Approval that covers the liquid, not the shirt it is printed on. “Non-toxic” is the certifiers' own words against it — Global Standards states that “Approval does not mean that an input is free from all hazardous substances”. Which certificates Kornit actually holds is unconfirmed here: kornit.com answers 403 to the honest user agent. OEKO-TEX · Global Standards

Sources

Where the claim appeared

Re-checks

  1. ◐ Partly true → ✗ False

    Kornit's own safety data sheet for NeoPigment Eco-Rapid White ink (SDS 60-SDSU-0112, revision 4.2, 9 April 2024) classifies it Acute Tox. 4, H302 "Harmful if swallowed", and Skin Sens. 1, H317 "May cause an allergic skin reaction", with the signal word warning, under 29 CFR 1910.1200. The ink's maker contradicts "non-toxic". The two certification marks were already cited at the wrong object when this verdict was published: STANDARD 100 certifies the garment and GOTS approves inputs without declaring them free of hazardous substances. No part of the claim holds as worded, so the rating is False. The SDS covers the white ink, the one a Kornit DTG shop uses most; we have not read the sheets for the other colours. kornit.com refuses our fetcher, so the sheet was read with a browser user agent.

    “H302 Harmful if swallowed.”
    kornit.com →

Issue research · section certification · last checked 2026-10-21