Independent industry knowledge base

Every gap is information.

For the people who run print-on-demand production — apparel, drinkware, wall art, objects, books. Source-checked, measured, direct. No vendor fluff, no number without a link.

Updated 2026-10-26 · 9 sections · 83 verdicts · Pulse Mondays · Podcast

Fact-check — 83 claims checked, 19 did not survive

18 confirmed · 39 partly · 7 unproven · 19 failed — each links its source →

“The Kornit Apollo prints up to 400 pieces per hour, with wet-on-wet pretreat and inline drying.”

✓ Confirmed

Kornit's own page says all three: “up to 400 impressions per hour” in the hero, “Up to 400 shirts per hour” in the technical specifications, and “350-400 prints per hour” in the FAQ. Kornit

Read the verdict →

We check before we print.

FACT-CHECK →

“AI-powered 8K line-scan cameras behind dryer tunnels are becoming the standard in DTG fulfilment.”

? No evidence

No vendor or fulfiller has documented such a deployment.

Read the verdict →
83 verdicts in the register Open the register →
Pulse — every Monday 2026-10-26 · 5 items

This week, checked:

  1. 01

    Bertelsmann builds a POD book plant. The group is opening a print-on-demand book facility at the Mohn Media site in Gütersloh in April 2027, with an initial capacity of 1.5 million books…

    printbusiness.co.uk →
  2. 02

    STAHLS' signs a five-year deal with the University Co-op in Austin. The Co-op gets Hotronix heat presses, Fan Edition software and sales kiosks, Fulfill Engine automation, blanks and decoration products, so it can…

    screenprintingmag.com →
  3. 03

    M&R brought DTF automation to Dallas. Returning to Impressions Expo after a break, M&R planned live demonstrations of its Quatro industrial DTF printer and the Orbiter, which loads…

    impressionsmagazine.com →
Read the whole issue — 2 more items →

Next one lands Monday. Want it?

Subscribe →

Free · no vendor money · unsubscribe any Monday

27,000 registeredPRINTING UnitedLas Vegas, by the organiser's own count

A preliminary 27,000 against more than 30,000 a year earlier, an equipment-weight figure the organiser's two releases do not reconcile, and the stand where a heat press rated at up to 300 garments an hour was quoted at 300 to 400.

Open section →
15× apartCost & durabilityCost and wash life, quoted without a method

Ink cost per shirt, cure time and wash life, as the people who sell the ink quote them: different units, no stated method, and one pair of figures that does not survive multiplication.

Open section →
7 checksCertificationWhat a mark actually certifies

Ink certified in 2018 and 2020, read as if the printer and the shirt were too. Seven checks since August found the same pattern: a mark that covers one narrow thing, quoted as if it covered a broad one.

Open section →
3 top speedsEmbroidery & colourOne machine, three speeds, and the thread

One machine with three top speeds depending on the frame, a thread that can cap all of them, and colour tolerances quoted in formulas nobody names.

Open section →
800 an hour, advertisedMarket & floorA speed belongs to a configuration

A folding machine its maker rates at 700 pieces an hour, for an A4-sized piece, advertised at 800. Apparel returns at a 25% median beside 35 to 45% on the same page. The autumn's deals and rate changes, read the same way: the number, and the scope it was stated for.

Open section →
4% or 12%EventsTwo attendance figures for one show

The Print Show in Birmingham reported a 12% rise; counted without one exclusion, it is 4%. Then the calendar to 2028 and the places to look things up.

Open section →

Earlier: Issue 001 — state of the industry, August 2026 · All issues →

How we work

METHOD →

A Verify

83 claims went through the check and 19 were published as failures. "AVT Helios does textile QC"? Label-industry tool. "8K cameras are standard in DTG"? No evidence anywhere. The failures stay up.

B Measure

A heat press rated at up to 300 garments an hour on its maker's page, and quoted at 300 to 400 on the stand. Every figure in this issue sits beside its source, none smoothed over. Every figure carries its link: 157 sourced references in Issue 002.

C Listen

Forums, podcasts, show floors. What operators actually argue about: DTF eating everything, cheap-machine trust after the Procolored malware scandal, the AI double-bind. Twenty voices worth following, mapped and linked.

What the file needs

PREP →

House rules

PRINCIPLES
R-01 Every number links to its source. 157 references in Issue 002. A claim without a link doesn’t run.
R-02 Public information only. Press releases, filings, trade press, research, community threads. No company internals — anyone’s.
R-03 No vendor money in editorial. 19 of 83 checked claims failed and are published anyway. If a paragraph reads like a brochure, it gets reprinted.
R-04 Written from the production floor. By people who read OEE dashboards before breakfast — for people who do the same.

Send a claim through the nozzle check.

A vendor said it, a forum repeats it, a brochure printed it. Paste it here — if it clears the gate, it gets a verdict with sources. Failed claims get published too.

1 · scout queue→2 · human gate→3 · verdict

A claim without a link cannot be checked · we read everything · no email required